![]() ![]() The scope of a judgment annulling a measure is limited in two respects: 230 EC)) Summaryġ Although, in cases where a measure has been annulled by the Community judicature, Article 176 of the Treaty (now Article 233 EC) requires the institution which had adopted that measure to ensure that any measure intended to replace it is not affected by the same irregularities as those identified in the judgment annulling the original measure, that provision does not mean that, at the request of parties to whom identical or similar decisions have been addressed, but who have not themselves brought proceedings, the institution must re-examine those decisions, allegedly affected by the same irregularity. Summary Parties Grounds Decision on costs Operative part Keywordsġ Actions for annulment - Judgment annulling a measure - Scope - Whether the institution concerned is obliged to re-examine a decision similar to the measure annulled but uncontested in judicial proceedings - No such obligationĢ Actions for annulment - Time-limits - Decision not contested in good time - Legal certainty - Whether the institution concerned is obliged to re-examine similar decisions - No such obligation Judgment of the Court of 14 September 1999.Ĭommission of the European Communities v AssiDomän Kraft Products AB, Iggesunds Bruk AB, Korsnäs AB, MoDo Paper AB, Södra Cell AB, Stora Kopparbergs Bergslags AB and Svenska Cellulosa AB.Īppeal - Effects in relation to third parties of a judgment annulling a measure. # Appeal - Effects in relation to third parties of a judgment annulling a measure. # Commission of the European Communities v AssiDomän Kraft Products AB, Iggesunds Bruk AB, Korsnäs AB, MoDo Paper AB, Södra Cell AB, Stora Kopparbergs Bergslags AB and Svenska Cellulosa AB. Judgment of the Court of 14 September 1999. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |